Provider pricing
Porter pricing
2 plans across 1 product, read from Porter's own pages and dated. No current monthly price can be ranked. The rows below state what is missing or why a previously checked fact is not used.
The meters Porter's pricing page does not total for you
A sticker price is compute. These are the charges that decide what the invoice says, and they are the reason two plans with identical vCPU and RAM can bill very differently.
platform plan plans
| Plan | vCPU | Memory | Storage | Price | Basis | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| StandardNot ranked: the source check is too oldn/a vCPU · n/a · no disk | n/a | n/a | none | Not publishedneeds usagechecked 2026-07-25 | needs usage | 2026-07-25 |
| EnterpriseNot ranked: the source check is too oldn/a vCPU · n/a · no disk | n/a | n/a | none | Not publishedquotechecked 2026-07-25 | quote | 2026-07-25 |
2 plans we will not put a number on
These are not omissions and they are not zero. Each one needs an input Porter cannot supply from a published page, so we name the missing input and link their page instead of estimating.
- Standard: needs requested vCPU-months; requested GB-RAM-months; underlying AWS, Azure, or GCP bill. Check it on Porter →
- Enterprise: needs enterprise volume-discount quote; requested resources; underlying cloud bill. Check it on Porter →
Where Porter runs
We have not confirmed a published region list for Porter, so these plans appear only when no region filter is applied. That is deliberate: an unconfirmed footprint must not read as global.
How to check every number above
Each price was read from Porter's own pages, most recently on 2026-07-25. Open the source, read the figure, and tell us if it has moved. Prices change and a comparison that does not say when it last looked is not worth trusting.
Compare Porter against every other provider · All providers · Report a wrong price · How we make money